Land question ticking bombSA expropriation tremors hit Namibia Local land activists have urged President Geingob to follow the example of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and his African National Congress, which supported an opposition motion to expropriate land without compensation in the neighbouring country. The South African parliament's passing of a motion that will in all likelihood lead to the expropriation of land without compensation has reignited Namibia's burning debate around the issue, with analysts warning that the Swapo government risks being caught with its pants down.
The motion, brought by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema, was adopted with a vote of 241 in support, and 83 against, with the ruling African National Congress (ANC) throwing its full weight behind the move.
Reacting to the news of what had transpired in the neighbouring country on Tuesday, local political commentator Ndumba Kamwanyah cautioned that the Namibian government, just like its South African counterpart, will be caught unaware when emotions over the land question spills over.
“South Africa never planned properly and thought the land issue will sort itself out, now it finds itself in a situation where the people on the ground are demanding for land and out of desperation it must make these radical decisions, otherwise ANC will suffer consequences.
“And there will also be economic consequences,” he said.
Kamwanyah also believes that South Africa's radical solution towards will eventually spillover to countries like Namibia which shares the same political history of land lost during colonial rule.
“It sounds appealing to the landless but it will have serious consequences we have to think this through before we sit with a problem,” he said.
Popular Democratic Movement (PDM) parliamentarian Nico Smit supports the expropriation of land in Namibia, saying the time has come for the country to deal with its absentee landlord crisis.
In 2016 the lands ministry confirmed that a total of 1.2 million hectares of Namibia's agricultural land are still under foreign ownership, with the majority being in German and South African hands.
This is despite a decision that was taken at the landmark 1991 national land conference that non-Namibians must not own farmland.
President Hage Geingob and his predecessor Hifikepunye Pohamba has both admitted that the willing buyer, willing seller policy has failed and needs to be revisited.
Smit, who said he was sharing his personal views, said the upcoming second land conference should tackle the issue of absentee landlords, among other burning issues.
“There are a lot of farming land occupied by absentee landlords that are not occupied to their full capacity.
“Namibians must have the first opportunity to have ownership, and then foreigners. But only if they contribute to the GDP, then one can consider them.
“It may even be necessary to change our constitution to address this. And these are the things the land conference must look at,” Smit said yesterday.
Henny Seibeb of the Landless People's Movement (LPM) also feel government must clamp down on absentee landlords, saying “they cannot only come to hunt”, but must contribute productively to the country's GDP.
The LPM, in its quest to push for land delivery, held its own land conference last year and the issue of land expropriation and communal land ownership for women featured prominently.
“We really hope Geingob will learn from the South African president Cyril Ramaphosa who, with his party the ANC, finally realised what the African masses have been calling for all these years.
“Last time Geingob said he learnt from former Zimbabwean president Robert Mugabe, but when he returned (from Harare) nothing happened. Swapo must learn from ANC,” he said.
Prominent land activist Sima Luipert argued against compensation after expropriation, saying the land belongs to the natives and was stolen from them through dubious means.
“When they resisted subjugation and stood up for their dignity and property and means of survival, they were met with mass murder and theft of property, including land.
Have those who lost land through such sinister and cruel means been compensated? Is it fair that those who dispossessed be compensated? How can you take my inheritance from me in such a cruel manner and expect payment for my heritage? At least you should come to the table for an amicable solution,” she argued.
To date, government has only expropriated four farms for which it has paid about N$8.6 million.
The process went smoothly because the farmers agreed to the purchase prices.
However, this process came to a standstill in 2006, when farm owners challenged expropriation notices for five farms in the High Court.
It is against this background that the government drafted its guidelines on expropriation that will soon be gazetted to make the acquisition process more transparent.
Government has in the meantime continued with its willing buyer, willing seller approach, which has not yielded the expected results.
In 2016 land reform minister Utoni Nujoma said government had acquired 36 farms at a cost of more than N$290 million, on which it resettled 57 families between April 2015 and February 2016.
JEMIMA BEUKES
The motion, brought by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema, was adopted with a vote of 241 in support, and 83 against, with the ruling African National Congress (ANC) throwing its full weight behind the move.
Reacting to the news of what had transpired in the neighbouring country on Tuesday, local political commentator Ndumba Kamwanyah cautioned that the Namibian government, just like its South African counterpart, will be caught unaware when emotions over the land question spills over.
“South Africa never planned properly and thought the land issue will sort itself out, now it finds itself in a situation where the people on the ground are demanding for land and out of desperation it must make these radical decisions, otherwise ANC will suffer consequences.
“And there will also be economic consequences,” he said.
Kamwanyah also believes that South Africa's radical solution towards will eventually spillover to countries like Namibia which shares the same political history of land lost during colonial rule.
“It sounds appealing to the landless but it will have serious consequences we have to think this through before we sit with a problem,” he said.
Popular Democratic Movement (PDM) parliamentarian Nico Smit supports the expropriation of land in Namibia, saying the time has come for the country to deal with its absentee landlord crisis.
In 2016 the lands ministry confirmed that a total of 1.2 million hectares of Namibia's agricultural land are still under foreign ownership, with the majority being in German and South African hands.
This is despite a decision that was taken at the landmark 1991 national land conference that non-Namibians must not own farmland.
President Hage Geingob and his predecessor Hifikepunye Pohamba has both admitted that the willing buyer, willing seller policy has failed and needs to be revisited.
Smit, who said he was sharing his personal views, said the upcoming second land conference should tackle the issue of absentee landlords, among other burning issues.
“There are a lot of farming land occupied by absentee landlords that are not occupied to their full capacity.
“Namibians must have the first opportunity to have ownership, and then foreigners. But only if they contribute to the GDP, then one can consider them.
“It may even be necessary to change our constitution to address this. And these are the things the land conference must look at,” Smit said yesterday.
Henny Seibeb of the Landless People's Movement (LPM) also feel government must clamp down on absentee landlords, saying “they cannot only come to hunt”, but must contribute productively to the country's GDP.
The LPM, in its quest to push for land delivery, held its own land conference last year and the issue of land expropriation and communal land ownership for women featured prominently.
“We really hope Geingob will learn from the South African president Cyril Ramaphosa who, with his party the ANC, finally realised what the African masses have been calling for all these years.
“Last time Geingob said he learnt from former Zimbabwean president Robert Mugabe, but when he returned (from Harare) nothing happened. Swapo must learn from ANC,” he said.
Prominent land activist Sima Luipert argued against compensation after expropriation, saying the land belongs to the natives and was stolen from them through dubious means.
“When they resisted subjugation and stood up for their dignity and property and means of survival, they were met with mass murder and theft of property, including land.
Have those who lost land through such sinister and cruel means been compensated? Is it fair that those who dispossessed be compensated? How can you take my inheritance from me in such a cruel manner and expect payment for my heritage? At least you should come to the table for an amicable solution,” she argued.
To date, government has only expropriated four farms for which it has paid about N$8.6 million.
The process went smoothly because the farmers agreed to the purchase prices.
However, this process came to a standstill in 2006, when farm owners challenged expropriation notices for five farms in the High Court.
It is against this background that the government drafted its guidelines on expropriation that will soon be gazetted to make the acquisition process more transparent.
Government has in the meantime continued with its willing buyer, willing seller approach, which has not yielded the expected results.
In 2016 land reform minister Utoni Nujoma said government had acquired 36 farms at a cost of more than N$290 million, on which it resettled 57 families between April 2015 and February 2016.
JEMIMA BEUKES